4.1 KiB
4.1 KiB
POC Readiness & Requirements Quality Checklist: Multilingual NLP Entity Inherence Classifier
Purpose: Validate requirement quality, clarity, and completeness for the POC implementation before code execution Created: 2026-08-20 Feature: spec.md | plan.md
Note: This custom checklist is generated by the /speckit-checklist command based on feature context and requirements.
Review Ownership: This checklist is a reviewer-owned requirements-quality review artifact. Mark an item [x] only when the reviewer determines the requirements-quality criterion is satisfied.
Marker Semantics: [x] means the criterion has been reviewed and satisfied for requirements quality. It does not mean implementation work is complete.
1. Requirement Completeness & Scope Boundaries
- CHK001 Are the required and optional fields of the ECP Snapshot explicitly specified with defaults? [Completeness, Spec §FR-003]
- CHK002 Is the CLI execution contract completely specified with argument names, flags, and file path requirements? [Completeness, Spec §FR-002]
- CHK003 Are explicit out-of-scope boundaries (no REST API, no live Neo4j, no worker queues) clearly stated to prevent scope creep? [Scope, Spec §Assumptions & Scope]
- CHK004 Is the behavior for missing
--output(printing to stdout) explicitly defined? [Completeness, Spec §FR-002]
2. Requirement Clarity & Decision Semantics
- CHK005 Are the 4 decision categories (
DIRECT_INHERENT,CONTEXTUAL_INHERENT,TANGENTIAL,NOT_RELATED) defined with unambiguous conditions? [Clarity, Spec §FR-005] - CHK006 Is the deterministic derivation rule for
is_inherent(truefor DIRECT/CONTEXTUAL,falsefor TANGENTIAL/NOT_RELATED) mathematically unambiguous? [Clarity, Spec §FR-006] - CHK007 Is the 3-tier hybrid execution order explicitly defined such that clear cases never invoke Tier 2/Tier 3? [Clarity, Spec §FR-004]
- CHK008 Are all standardized error codes (
invalid_ecp_json,invalid_markdown,unsupported_language,empty_content,missing_required_field) enumerated? [Clarity, Spec §FR-008]
3. Requirement Consistency & Alignment
- CHK009 Do the example filenames in
spec.md,plan.md,quickstart.md, andtasks.mdalign consistently without discrepancies? [Consistency, Plan §Project Structure] - CHK010 Is the benchmark test file name (
tests/test_benchmark_24.py) consistent across all documentation artifacts? [Consistency, Quickstart §3] - CHK011 Are dependencies strictly limited to
pytestwithout mandatory external AI/cloud packages? [Consistency, Plan §Technical Context]
4. Acceptance Criteria & Measurability
- CHK012 Is the POC benchmark suite quantified with an explicit test count (24 cases = 6 languages × 4 decision types)? [Measurability, Spec §SC-002]
- CHK013 Is the accuracy target (≥ 90% precision) bounded specifically to the controlled 24-case benchmark suite? [Measurability, Spec §SC-002]
- CHK014 Is the execution latency target (< 200ms for Tier 1) testable and quantified? [Measurability, Spec §SC-004]
5. Scenario & Edge Case Coverage
- CHK015 Are requirements specified for malformed Markdown or empty content files? [Edge Cases, Spec §FR-008]
- CHK016 Are requirements specified for corrupted JSON or missing required ECP fields? [Edge Cases, Spec §FR-008]
- CHK017 Are negative anchor suppression rules specified for homonym disambiguation? [Coverage, Spec §FR-005]
- CHK018 Are graph snapshot relationship matches (weight, scope, relation_type) accounted for in contextual inherence decisions? [Coverage, Spec §FR-003, §FR-005]
Notes
- Mark items
[x]only after review confirms the requirement-quality criterion is satisfied. - Leave items unchecked when they still require clarification, correction, or reviewer evaluation.
/speckit-implementreads checklist checkbox state as a gate and must not modify markers.checklists/requirements.mdhas a separate built-in lifecycle maintained by/speckit-specifyand/speckit-clarify.